How can teachers use technology effectively in the primary
classroom?
ICT has been a big part of education since from when I was
in primary school years ago. From personal experience, we were rewarded with
ICT time. This included using Nintendo DS’, computers, iPads etc. It argues
that primary ICT is subject to a set of ‘big’ priorities that often have little
to do with the day-to-day concerns of teachers and learners. Selwyn et al
explained how education is on the brink of being transformed through learning
technologies; however, it has been on that brink for some decades now. Selwyn,
Potter and Cranmer’s book goes on to say how In the UK ICT is used to refer to
the digital technologies themselves, but also to the discrete curriculum
subject. In the original version of the National Curriculum for primary
schools, the use of computers was part of Design and Technology, before
enjoying several years of growth and development as a subject under the label
of ‘Information Technology’. The change in 2000 to a curriculum subject called
‘ICT’ signalled a formal move towards a more inclusive way of working with a technology
in school, with subsequent schemes of work emphasising a cross-curricular
approach. (primary schools and ICT; learning from pupil perspectives. Selwyn et
al., (2010) p.5)
ICT is important in primary education because it enables
kids to search for the information they need and to organise what they have
found. As children progress through the school system, they become increasingly
responsible for their own learning. Many believe that ICT needs to be better integrated
into curriculum's, so all schools produce computer literate, independent
learners.
The question is how can ICT help education? ICT can enhance
the quality of education in several ways: by increasing learner motivation and
engagement, by facilitating the acquisition of basic skills, and by enhancing
teacher training. ICT also transformational tools which, when used
appropriately can promote the shift to learner-centred environment.
One of the most significant ‘digital’ issues to have recently
captured the attention of sociologists of education is the temporal and spatial
expansion of educational processes and practices through technological means.
Indeed, the negation of boundaries lied at the heart of the ideological
promises of digital education. (Selwyn, N & Facer, K. (2010) p.6)
The provision of digital education on an expanded and
accelerated ‘any time, any place, any pace’ basis raises a host of questions
relating to educational engagement and educational governance – not least the
redistribution of responsibilities across different sites and actors (Webster
2013). Technologies are seen to be enabling educational engagement regardless
of place, space or setting. (Selwyn, N & Facer, K. (2010) p.7) Selwyn’s
(2011) study of globally distributed cohorts of distance learners found the processes
of online study to be constrained substantially for many women by the temporal constraints
of child-raising and household work commitments. Similarly, Erichsen and
colleagues’ (2013) study of online doctoral education highlighted issues of
cultural and racial (mis)understandings between students and staff as impeding
the fully beneficial ‘participation’ of many students. As such the individualisation
of action associated with these digital forms of education could be increasing
the risks as well as opportunities of educational engagement. As such, this
work reminds us that the positioning of technology-supported individualisation as
a biographical solution to systemic contradictions is not without its potential
problems (Popkewitz 2006).
There are challenges when defining digital literacy as Savage,
M & Barnett, A (2015) suggest that the traditional interpretation it means
to be able to read and write. This definition largely reflects the time in
which it came into common use and the dominate tools for accessing and
communicating knowledge and understanding beyond verbal discourse, i.e. written
and printed text in physical forms. One simple was to extend this traditional definition
would be to say it is about ‘reading media and writing (producing) media’ (Ryberg
and Georgsen, 2010, p.91)
The national curriculum for computing begins with the
following statement regarding the purpose of study:
Computing also ensures that pupils become digitally
literate – able to use, and express themselves and develop their ideas through,
information and communication technology – at a level suitable for the future
workplace and as active participants in a digital world.
(DfE, 2013)
Digital literacy is also referred to in the computing
curriculum aims to ensure that all pupils:
·
Can evaluate and apply information technology,
including new or unfamiliar technologies, analytically to solve problems;
·
Are responsible, competent, confident and
creative users of information and communication technology.
(DfE, 2013)
Digital literacy components of the Key Stage 1 and Key Stage
2 computing programmes of study (DfE, 2013)
|
Key Stage 1 pupils should be taught to:
|
Key Stage 2 pupils should be taught to:
|
|
·
Use technology purposefully to create,
organise, store, manipulate and retrieve digital content;
·
Recognise the common uses of
information technology beyond school;
·
Use technology safely and respectfully,
keeping personal information private; identify where to go for help and support
when they have concerns about content or contact on the internet or other
online technologies.
|
·
Understand computer networks which can include
the internet; how they can provide multiple services, such as the world wide
web; and the opportunities they offer for communication and collaboration;
·
Use search technologies effectively,
appreciate how results are selected and ranked, and be discerning
in evaluating digital content;
·
Select, use and combine a variety
of software (including internet services) on a range of digital
devices to design and create a range of programs, systems and content
that accomplish given goals, including collecting, analysing, evaluating
and presenting data and information;
·
use technology safely, respectfully and
responsibly; recognise acceptable/unacceptable behaviour; identify a
range of ways to report concerns about content and contract.
|
References
Selwyn, N et al., (2010) Primary schools and ICT; learning
from pupil perspectives. Wiltshire
Techwalla: https://www.techwalla.com/articles/importance-of-ict-in-primary-education
(undated) (accessed on 08.07.19)
ICT enabled education: https://stories.linways.in/ict-enabled-education-d190bcc91bf0
Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2014). The sociology of
education and digital technology: past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education
Savage, M., & Barnett, A (2015). Digital
Literacy for Primary Teachers. Northwich
No comments:
Post a Comment